The Planetary Flag


The International Planetary Flag of Earth

I started out to write a post about inclusion.  The further I got into it the more it changed from being about inclusion to why do we think we have the “right” to claim a place as “ours” just because we have visited it.

The Neil Armstrong & Buzz Aldrin moon landing

Let me explain. I first became aware of this “flag” as if it were The International Flag of the Planet Earth  but as it turns out it’s an idea, floated by a  Swedish student has proposed a way of representing Earth, rather than some individual country when future space travelers venture out into the universe. Right now I realize those goals are a bit chance-y, what with a President who seems to dislike science and wants to cut the budget to smithereens — but it’s an interesting idea — representing the entire planet by a blue flag representing life and water, with seven interlocking circles for the continents, and a flower in the center representing life.

When NASA landed on the moon it was a big deal.  We were newlyweds at the time and we had no TV.  I can remember going to the mall to spend what little savings we had on a 13” or 14” black and white TV because I wanted to see with my own eyes the promised coverage about the landing with my own eyes.  I guess my trust issues started early on… eh?  That was something I had to witness;  I wasn’t about to take anyone’s word for it.

This phenomenon is something that intrigues me.  It’s not just an American (as in U.S.) phenomenon but we are certainly among the proponents of claiming things.  During the Second World War there was the ubiquitous Killroy who seemed to have been everywhere before most of the soldiers arrived.  Other countries had their versions.  The Brits had “Mr. Chad” and the Aussies had “Foo was here”! Other versions included  Smoe, Clem, Flywheel, Private Snoops, Overby, The Jeep (as both characters had sizable noses), and Sapo.

But I’ve been thinking about the way it is with humans.  Greeks wanted to make the whole world Greek.  Romans wanted to make the world Roman.  The Mongols invaded and they had the similar goals.  The Nazis were hampered in their dreams by WWII but there’s no end to the story of domination and intended domination.

Europeans who invaded North America did the same. They pretended that no one “owned” the place and then drove the First Nations out of their homelands.  That is something we essentially continue doing if you consider the recent events in North Dakota and ask yourself why it’s ok to break a treaty with the Indians after the non-Indian people of North Dakota resisted having a pipeline go across their land.  But that’s a topic for some other day.

Of course we Citizens of the United States went one further.  First we claimed the country for our motherland, then when Momma England tried to tax us we said the heck with the motherland and we claimed it for ourselves — gladly going to war with England for our rights.

I find it frustrating and blindly ignorant of our own history that we as a nation now stand on the stage of history and tell other countries that they should not do what we did.  All the polluting and laying bare of natural resources that we object to when developing countries do them are things we did ourselves when we were in their stage of development.  It’s like it’s ok for the first guy to do it, but if you’re the second guy to try it’s off limits.  Hardly a neighborly way to be, is it?

It seems that the more unhappy we are, the more “things” we need to compensate for whatever it is that made us unhappy. If we are living a life we love, with people we care about, all those “ things” are unnecessary.

Even today there are atrocities to be found if a person is paying any attention to world news. Not the least of which is the question about should we be drilling for oil in arctic regions.  When faced with leaks and spills we’re being told that it’s too cold and too dangerous to perform certain kinds of repairs during the winter and that leaks and spills should be allowed; and my question is, if it’s too dangerous/cold to take care of what is being built maybe it shouldn’t be built at all until there IS a way of doing those things.  But then I’m an avowed nature lover so my voice probably isn’t valid.

I know it’s a popular idea to own things.  In this country you pretty much have to own things.  The world seems to have migrated away from socialist and communist ideas of group ownership.  Families are more fragmented nowadays too.  There was a time when land stayed in the family and generation after generation operated a farm or ran a business.  But the children of farmers quickly discovered that farm work was a lot harder than office work and children began leaving the farm communities.  Third and fourth generation business families often found that ‘their heart’ wasn’t in the family business and their family firms got sold off to investors and conglomerates.  You can’t blame anyone for wanting an easier life, can you?  Specially not if selling became a windfall for the third or fourth generation children! Why not take the money and run.  The end result, however, is that people are no longer connected with anything.  Companies think nothing of moving employees around the country — and the world — at a whim.  The upset to the family is discounted for the additional wages earned — supposedly.  But the net result is a world where no one is connected even to their own kin.

To be honest, I’m not sure where I stand on some of the manifestations of “progress.”  I see lots of development that is making people lots of money; but I see those same people increasingly unhappy about their life.  I see continuing declines in family and a resulting catastrophic impact on shared values and shared care.  We put kids in day care, seniors in nursing homes and the middle generations seem to live as if they extremes of age didn’t exist or shouldn’t be allowed to complicate their lives.  I find it all very strange.

I happened to have been an only child.  But I had kids in the neighborhood with whom to play.  I spent a lot of time around old people — never understood how exactly that happened, but I know this:  I learned an immense amount about life by being around people old enough to be grand parents or great grandparents — even if they weren’t mine.  We lived in an immigrant community with a couple foreign languages (as in not English) being spoken and we all learned from each other because we rubbed shoulders with our neighbors every day.  Nowadays we drive around in cars with the windows rolled up and the iPod blaring.  Kids stare at smartphone screens — and adults too — all day long.  No one seems to want to interact with other humans at all.

Maybe that’s what I like about living where we are.  There are people here.  We see them every day.  We talk to them regularly.  They are close enough that we know when something’s wrong, or when we can lend a hand, and they are genuinely happy to be helped — not resentful.

It’s becoming a different world.  I’m glad I’m in it — which is to say I’m glad to be alive — but I sure don’t know where it’s going.

 

Advertisements

4 Comments

    1. Yup. We U.S. residents can be mighty arrogant. We don’t really have a word that describes us as a people. I know I cringe every time I use the word american as if I were speaking of citizens of this country but there’s never been a consensus about using another word.

      It’s interesting, Linda, that this should be the case. Linguists will tell you that the most basic concepts of a society are the things that have no words for them in a country’s language — because words are not needed to express those ideas which are truly universal.

      For us, one of those universal truths is that in this country it’s assumed that it is the best country in the world. Essentially, that nothing else, no one else, matters. I find that scary.

      Like

  1. Claiming something for a country has been a long time situation. You are right, we fail to see the greater good and only look to see the personal benefit. That is why I have always admired people like Ben Franklin who wanted the world to reap the benefits of his inventions…and Elon Musk has done similarly in terms of the electric cars.

    I think there is a way to improve our global success if we look at the bigger picture. I recently have gained a tremendous amount of respect for Bill and Melinda Gates and the work they have done for the greater good. At one time, I disliked that so much of their work went to third world countries. Having seen money poured into these countries with very little result, I thought it a waste of resources. But, I was misinformed about what they were actually doing. If you haven’t seen this before, here is an excellent article/letter sent to Warren Buffet which outlines their activities. https://www.gatesnotes.com/2017-Annual-Letter?

    WT.mc_id=02_14_2017_02_AL2017_BG-POL_&WT.tsrc=BGPOL

    Another one is Anderson Cooper’s Hero Awards which celebrate individuals each year that do something meaningful to improve the life conditions around the world. Some truly fantastic stuff. Google it. If I do another link, WordPress will send my reply to your spam folder.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. There are some individuals who stand alone and epitomize working for the greater good. WE could use some more though. I saw the gates letter and Buffet’s activities — kind of follow what they are doing with a curious eye to see there it all leads. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

You’ve heard what I’m thinking. What's on YOUR mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s